The Quomps Christchurch Quay BH23 1BZ Data via plota.co.uk

Pending P/26/02828/TCA
Council
Date received
14 Jun 2026
Date validated
14 Jun 2026
Postcode
BH23 1BZ

Description

T269 Populus x candicans (Weeping poplar) - Aerial Surveys/Climbing Inspections - Inspect upper north limb at historic failure point for decay; reduce or remove if necessary & Remove major deadwood as much as reasonably possible including small hanging branches T271 Salix x chrysocoma (Weeping willow) - Remove major deadwood and reduce heavy branch weight on the central primary leader with hazard beam by approx 3m. Lightly reduce the adjacent co-dominant leader to match height. Reduce the lateral leader on the north side, with crossing branch, by approximately 2m T273 Salix x chrysocoma (Weeping willow) - Fell to ground level T277 Prunus species (Cherry) - Fell to ground level T281 Salix x chrysocoma (Weeping willow) - Remove major deadwood T282 Platanus x hispanica (London plane) - Aerial Surveys/Climbing Inspections - Carry out an aerial inspection of the upper branch structure to determine whether Massaria disease is present on scaffold limbs and to assess any associated decay or dieback. · Remove major deadwood T289 Alnus cordata (Italian Alder) - Fell to ground level T291 Platanus x hispanica (London plane) - Aerial Surveys/Climbing Inspections - Carry out an aerial inspection of the upper branch structure to determine whether Massaria disease is present on scaffold limbs and to assess any associated decay or dieback. Prune to clear lamp column - by 0.5m · Remove major deadwood · Reduce heavy branch weight by - low primary limb to south with jelly ear, reduce by 1.5m T292 Platanus x hispanica (London plane) - Aerial Surveys/Climbing Inspections - Carry out an aerial inspection of the upper branch structure to determine whether Massaria disease is present on scaffold limbs and to assess any associated decay or dieback. · Crown lift to 2.3 m over Footpath · Remove major deadwood… Data via plota.co.uk

Work with planning data? Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service

BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026