Bibury Trout Farm Arlington Bibury Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 5NL Data via plota.co.uk

26/00015/FUL - Full Application Awaiting decision

Proposal

Retrospective car park adjacent to Shoecroft Barn and alterations to access Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
25 Mar 2026
Decision
Awaiting decision

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. The consultation period closed on 23 Apr 2026.

Documents 110

Consultation & comments 98

PDF GCC HIGHWAYS OFFICER Consultee Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF STATON Objection Comment · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HUDSON Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHALLINOR Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHALLINOR Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JONES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF EDWARD Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WESTBROOK EDWARD Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JONES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF IVE Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF FRANSES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WALES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SWIRSKI Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WALES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PRACH Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JAMES Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JAMES (A) Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SAXBY Objection Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF KIGGINS Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WILLIAMS Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HAISTE Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LAWRENCE Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF COX Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWMAN Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWMAN Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ROYDEN Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BROWNE Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF GRAY Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PARKINSON Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HAZELWOOD Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHILD Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HAZELWOOD Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LIDDELL Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAXTER Objection Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF P PHILLIPS Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF G PHILLIPS Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF A MASON Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CORBO Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF MACLEAN Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HARRIS Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF M MASON Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF MATTHEWS Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF J MASON Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WILLIAMS Objection Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF TICKELL Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ALDERTON Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHALLINOR Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HACKETT Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PHILLIPS Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF HOUSLEY Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF MACLEAN Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF FORRESTER Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF COOK Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WALKER Objection Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WRIGHT Objection Comment · 18 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WRIGHT Objection Comment · 18 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LOWE Objection Comment · 18 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LAWRENCE Objection Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHAPPLE Objection Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAROUGH Objection Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAROUGH Objection Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAROUGH Objection Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PARISH COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF D KINDER Objection Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF KINDER Objection Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CHIVERTON Objection Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BOOTH Objection Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF GEARING Objection Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JOHNSTON Objection Comment · 15 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF C KINDER Objection Comment · 15 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF MASON Objection Comment · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF J A'BEAR Objection Comment · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF R A'BEAR Objection Comment · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF FARMAR Objection Comment · 14 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CATLING Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF MARSHALL Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF RILEY Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LOMAS Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CURTIS Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF FARMAR Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF BAINES Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF KIRWAN-TAYLOR Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF T DIVER Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF C DIVER Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF M DIVER Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF W DIVER Objection Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ARMITAGE Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF R HEDGELAND Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF R HEDGELAND Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF J HEDGELAND Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ILES Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ILES Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ILES Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ILES Objection Comment · 12 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CURTIS Objection Comment · 11 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ARMITAGE Objection Comment · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF FOLLETT HOLT Objection Comment · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SENIOR CONSERVATION & DESIGN OFFICER Consultee Comment · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Important details

Council
Cotswold
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
GL7 5NL
Received
25 Mar 2026
Validated
25 Mar 2026
Ward
Coln Valley
Parish
Bibury
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 May 2026
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14596402
Comments by
23 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Cotswold
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#218 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Cotswold is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #219 out of 296. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cotswold decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #128 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #150 of 296
53%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #219 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #212 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
123 decided (1-9 homes)
74%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
38 decided
1,252
Total decisions
138 refused in the year to March 2026