Flat A, 40 Colvestone Crescent, Hackney, London, E8 2LH Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Rear garden: Cherry T1 (8M high, 250mm dia.) - Fell to ground level. See Arb Report from AXA Insurance for reasons. Data via plota.co.uk
Work with planning data? Every application in Hackney - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service
Other new applications on this street
30 Colvestone Crescent, Hackney, London, E8 2LH
Replacement of existing single glazed timber windows on front side and rear elev...
16 Colvestone Crescent, Hackney, London, E8 2LH
T1 - Cherry - reduce to previous points of reduction - 1-2m branch removal T2 - ...
Second Floor Flat, 104 Colvestone Crescent, Hackney, London, E8 2LJ
Erection of a hip-to-gable roof extension, rear dormer extension, insertion of r...
Flat 1, 86 - 88 Colvestone Crescent, Hackney, London, E8 2LJ
T1 – Lime Proposed Works: Crown reduction / Re-pollard. Remove 3-4 metres of reg...
Nearby new applications
59-61 Kingsland High Street, London, E8 2JS
Submission of details pursuant to conditions 3 (Materials), 4 (Drawings), 5 (Was...
Rose Hotel, Ground Floor Rear, 69 Stoke Newington Road, Hackney, London, N16 8AD
Variation of condition 1 (Approved Plans) attached to planning permission ref 20...
17A Ridley Road, Hackney
External alterations comprising the reconfiguration of fenestration; new residen...
89 Mildmay Grove North, London, N1 4PL
T1- Magnolia tree in front garden- crown reduction of up to approximately 2m on ...
388 Queensbridge Road, Hackney, London, E8 3AR
Sycamore. Rear garden. 30% reduction (up to 2m from branch tips), up to 20% thin...
11 Belgrade Road, Hackney, London, N16 8DH
Erection of a single-storey side/rear extension; erection of a rear dormer roof ...
Historical activity at this location
25 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Nearby activity
Hackney is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #220 out of 296. Hackney is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 84% approved vs 90% nationally.